Note: This page presents critical documentation and testimony related to a major incident during the ongoing custody dispute between Nikki Ngo and Lauriston Crockett III. The evidence highlights a pattern of manipulation, false allegations, and escalation tactics used when legal momentum shifted.

Overview: Manufactured Crisis

Throughout the child custody case, Nikki Ngo repeatedly introduced new “emergencies” or “concerns”—especially at moments when her legal position weakened. One of the most troubling examples is the “recovered memory” incident, which dramatically escalated into false accusations of attempted murder.

This manufactured event not only endangered Mr. Crockett’s reputation and legal rights but also undermines the legitimacy of the legal process by exploiting emotional and psychological tactics for personal gain.

This is the affidavit of Marilee Taylor documenting the day of the incident. . The summary is below.

Affidavit Summary: Testimony of Marilee Taylor

The following summary is based on the affidavit of Marilee Taylor, a former employee of Ms. Ngo. She was originally hired as a housekeeper and later worked closely in a nanny role. Her firsthand observations offer clear insight into the troubling pattern of behavior displayed by Ms. Ngo during her relationship with Mr. Crockett.

Emotional Manipulation and Self-Harm Threats

  • Manipulative Behavior Around Time Off:

“I noticed a pattern that if Ms. Ngo knew that I was going to be taking time off, she would hurt herself—almost like, ‘I’ll show Mr. Crockett he can take care of the baby with no help from her or the nanny.’”

  • Incident Laughter and Confession:

Ms. Taylor recalled Ms. Ngo laughing when recounting the event:

“Yes, I said I wished God would just take me.”

  • False Emergency Setup:

On the day of the garage incident, Ms. Ngo kissed the baby on the forehead, said “I’m sorry you had to hear that,” and walked into Mr. Crockett’s office to scream one final time. Shortly after, a loud boom was heard from the garage.

Mr. Crockett ran outside in concern, believing something serious had occurred.
This appeared orchestrated.

Financial Motivations Behind Conflict

  • Attempts to Secure Excessive Financial Support:

Ms. Ngo tried to get Mr. Crockett to sign a document stating she would receive $7,000/month, while asserting he only needed $2,800/month to live.

  • Rejection by Lawyer and Escalation:

After learning from a lawyer that she was only eligible for $1,800/month in child support, Ms. Ngo became increasingly angry and began shopping for a new attorney.

She later insisted on $7,000/month, allegedly encouraged by a friend or lawyer to “be nice to Mr. Crockett” to manipulate the situation.

Disengagement and Emotional Neglect

  • Failure to Engage in Family Life:

Despite designating daily family time (5:45–6:45 PM), Ms. Ngo consistently left the room or house whenever Mr. Crockett tried to participate.

She spent much of her time isolated in her office or socializing outside the home.

  • Avoiding Contact with Mr. Crockett:

“If he walked into the room, she would walk out.”

Fabricated Domestic Incident

  • Manipulated Physical Encounter:

One Sunday, Ms. Ngo attempted to grab the baby out of Mr. Crockett’s arms in a dangerous manner. In response, he pushed her back with one arm while protecting the child with the other.

Mr. Crockett called Ms. Taylor in real-time, expressing concern that Ms. Ngo might falsely accuse him of domestic violence.

He feared she would tell others that he had “hit her”—a claim he categorically denied.

Legal and Personal Strategy Observed

  • Tactical Behavior Change for Custody Goals:

Ms. Ngo was informed by her legal team that she needed to appear involved in the household business for custody benefits. This led her to temporarily shift her behavior—not out of sincerity, but as a strategic move.

  • Evidence of Financial Motivation in Relationships:

According to Ms. Taylor, Ms. Ngo had previously ended a marriage due to lack of financial support, suggesting a pattern of relationship decisions driven by monetary outcomes.

Conclusion

The “Recovered Memory” incident is not an isolated example, but rather part of a pattern of manipulation, deceit, and emotional exploitation displayed by Nikki Ngo throughout this custody battle. The testimony of Marilee Taylor reinforces the seriousness of these concerns, offering insight into the lengths to which Ms. Ngo has gone in order to secure control—both financially and legally—at the expense of honesty, emotional safety, and the child’s wellbeing.

This page will be updated with further sworn affidavits and legal documentation as the case develops.